|
First and foremost, retail investors are consumers - thus the word
"retail." |
|
|
|
|
|
First and foremost, retail investors are consumers - thus the word
"retail." |
|
|
|
|
08:41 AM in "Frank discussions" | Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog
(0)
| |
|
|
|
Since the launch of our MUNCmessaging program, I have been joining our sales people on many of their sales call ( four or five a day...phew ) – sometimes participating, always listening. |
|
One prospect - who is becoming a client ;) - said “Our communications [to retail] was always shooting from the hip. We’d do a webcast or live conference once in a while. No follow-up. Nothing consistent.” No realistic, easy to execute plan. Of great interest to me– this sentiment was mirrored from companies across all capitalizations. IRO perception is that most IR service providers only offered “shoot-from-the-hip” solutions. A webcast here, an email list there. |
|
01:47 PM in "Frank discussions", All, chronologically, Retail Investor Targeting, Stock promotion | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: individual investors, investor relations, MUNCmedia, Retail investor targeting, shareholder communications
Reblog
(0)
| |
|
|
Video length: 45 seconds |
There's been a lot of media, blog and Twitter discussions about Google’s announcement regarding their taking advantage of the SEC’s 2008 interpretation of RegFD. It’s a topic that I am very familiar with for a few reasons includuing: 1.) it was my Shareholder.com data that NIRI brought to the Hill back in 2008 that drove the interpretation, |
|
2.) I obvivosly know the product workings of both IR website disclosure and 3.) the newswire product processes quite well. I have been asked several times since Google’s “Earth Shattering Announcement” (capitalized that to make it look important) for my opinion on this. My Opinion (capitalized that to make it look important) is….. it’s a moot point for my MUNCmedia clients – which is my focus now. The overarching reason that public companies select to work with MUNCmedia is that their broadly disseminated news is not proactively reaching eyeballs (cue Frank video above). Regardless if it’s a 6,000 word earnings release or a 400 word “snippet” with a link to the full content, until a company gets their ticker into an investor, media or analyst watchlist, having their news passively sitting somewhere is not effective outreach. What am I defining as a watchlist? Any mechanism (financial web portal, IR website, institutional terminals) that sends out an alert that “xyz company has issued a news release.” This blatent MUNCmedia sales pitch aside, my belief is that newswires continue to be a very effective and IR friendly one-stop distribution channel to established investors and media. I’m dodging the main question, aren't I? Should companies switch to a “notice & access” model for press releases? How the @#$%& would I know that? I ABSOLUTELY do know that tactically -and for RegFD compliance- companies can switch. But a tactical “can” is unrelated to a strategic “should.” Even though he's the grumpiest looking of the four in this IR Alert post, I like what my friend Jeff Stacey (GlobeNewswire) stated: “The term "best practice" is relative as each implementation is highly dependent on the company and the type of announcement. There are many nuances that influence what makes a best practice. Each company must measure whether the end goal is SEC disclosure, generating news coverage, reducing costs, engaging more directly with customers, attracting investors or a combination of any number of these factors.” Closing Thought. ( I capitalized it to make it look important) Perhaps companies need to ask their investors how they want to receive their news? That’s actually the genesis of the “notice & access” moniker anyway (it was stolen from eproxy). IE: if your institutional holders’ daily workflow is all within Bloomberg, ThomsonOne, FactSet – then companies may not want to interrupt that business process. Consider the fee for 6,000 words and snazzy XHTML tables as a cost of business. Retail Investors? MUNC is your best COB. Have a great day and see you at the NIRI Conference |
|
05:45 PM in "Frank discussions", All, chronologically, Industry Discussions, Investor Relations websites | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: individual investors, investor relations, MUNCmedia, Retail investor targeting, shareholder communications
Reblog
(0)
| |
|
|
|
At my previous role, I did not interact much with small-cap (and below) corporations. Truthfully, I never thought much about them. I was a “mid-cap and above snob.” Or perhaps I just simply did not work with them directly enough. They were not our major market. |
|
1.) The CEOs are extremely passionate about their products, more than their stock price. Liquidity is precious for re-investment into their company for growth, liquidity is not so much shareholders (yet). They believe the strength of Retail Investors is their long-term loyalty. 2.) They feel invisible to the media and investors. The video of Frank above speaks to that. Another point expressed by our clients is their frustration at the “small-cap” predatory vendors. As one CEO commented – “These %&^#$ taint the OTC companies with this %&^#$. And they waste my money.” As you see, he was a little %&^#$ mad. Have a great day. |
|
|
|
Other than the cheeky little video I posted about Investor Relations and Social Media, the snippet introducing Frank Lane, was the highest blog traffic to date. Thank you - here’s more video about how MUNCmedia works. |
|
Of the two, I’d say Investor fairs bring in qualified “shoppers” as if an individual is going to invest their time and effort to attend a fair, if follows that they would invest their dollars too. Opt-in databases have gone the way of passenger pigeon (metaphor intended). Last month, I received another retail investor checklist for more information IN. THE. MAIL. This retail investor direct mailing stemmed from a request for a single annual report I made over six years ago. Am being sold on a list as a qualified retail investor? Like many individuals, my personal email has changed a couple times since my initial opt-in, (this was before the ubiquitous gmail) so I do not receive their retail investor emails anymore. Safe to say, the retail investor of six years ago is not the retail investor of today. Retail investors are dynamic. So is Frank for that matter! J |
|
|
|
I am very pleased to introduce you to MUNCmedia's VP of Client Operations, Frank Lane. |
I'll be featuring Frank each week. Please contact me directly if you would like a set of our case studies or, if you prefer, I can help you schedule some time to speak with Frank. Also, follow me > @BHSMITH |
|
